Skip to main content

Java Puzzler

I bought the book Java Puzzlers by Josh Bloch and Neal Gafter a few years ago and enjoyed it. If you aren't familiar with it, it covers rare, odd and usually counter-intuitive edge cases of Java in a brain-teaser style of presentation. For both a Java user and an analytical mind its a fascinating book.

Well today I stumbled onto a puzzler of my own and thought I'd share. Can you tell me what the main method of this class will output?
1 : public class Parser {
2 :
3 : private static <T> T parse(String s, Class<T> type) {
4 : // Simple implementation only supports long primitive
5 : if(type == long.class) {
6 : return (T) Long.parseLong(s);
7 : }
8 : throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
9 : "parse() only supports long right now!");
10: }
11:
12: public static void main(String[] args) {
13: System.out.println(parse("1234", long.class).equals(1234));
14: }
15: }

So what gets written to standard output? If you said 'true', then you'd be wrong. If you said 'false', then you'd also be wrong! The code above won't even compile! There are a few features of Java that are colliding here to give odd results, including generics, type erasure, primitive types and autoboxing.

So what happens exactly? You'll get a compile error like this:
Error:line (6) inconvertible types
found : long
required: T
The error is on the return statement line of the parse() method. Long.parseLong() returns a primitive long, but since a parameter type can only represent an Object type, you can't cast a primitive to an parameter type. Also, it appear auto-boxing doesn't work in this case, so it fails with a compiler error.

But wait, doesn't the code explicitly use the Class object that represents the long primitive, long.class? But see 'long.class' is syntactic sugar for the constant field Long.TYPE which is of the parameterized type Class<Long> since type variables only support using Objects.

So realizing this, we can change the return statement to use a Long instead of a long:
    return (T) Long.valueOf(s);
Now the code will compile, but something is still wrong because it prints out 'false'.

Knowing that the return type of parse("1234", long.class) is Long, take another look at the puzzle. Can you see the problem? This one is subtle. The numeric literal '1234' that is inside the call to equals() needs to be auto-boxed and since it is a literal int, it is boxed into a Integer. But an Integer object isn't considered equal to a Long object because they are different types, so equals() returns false.

So it a few interesting features combine for some strange behavior. Hope you enjoyed this puzzle!

Comments

Neal Gafter said…
Most of the puzzlers in our book aren't rare; in fact, they're taken out of actual problems people have encountered while writing production code. However, the issues are distilled to their essence in the book.
My apologies if I mischaracterized it. It is a great book and one I recommend to other programmers as a must-read because its so informative and accessible.

Popular posts from this blog

Simplifying logging with Maven and SLF4J

UPDATE: Ceki commented below which prompted me to rewrite the third paragraph. UPDATE 2: I have a better way of configuring Maven and SLF4J now. The mismatch between logging frameworks always seems to come up in projects I've developed over the years. Little-by-little I've learned and relearned how to navigate the nest of runtime logging that occurs in non-trivial applications. With my latest project I think I finally converged on a solution that I'll carry forward to future projects. So what am I really talking about? Have you ever been stumped, even for a short time, about where a certain log message is going and why it might not appear in your log? Often this happens when you are trying to debug an issue with a third-party library that's using a different logging implementation them your application. If you are nodding from familiarity, skip the next paragraph. Let's start from the beginning. There are several logging implementations available for Java, th

3D Photo Viewer for Looking Glass

The Looking Glass I created my first Chrome extension, which is now live on the Chrome Web Store ! It's built for the Looking Glass , a holographic display that let's you view three-dimensional objects without glasses. I've also opened the source to the extension on GitHub. The Chrome extension allows you to view Facebook's "3D Photos", a feature they added in 2018 for displaying photos that include a depth map like those from phones with dual cameras, such as Apple's "Portrait Mode". Getting Started To use the extension, connect your Looking Glass to your computer, navigate to Facebook and open the viewer from the extension's popup menu. This will open a browser window on the Looking Glass display's screen in fullscreen mode. Opening the Viewer Once the viewer is open, the extension watches for any 3D Photo files being downloaded, so browse around Facebook looking for 3D Photos.  I recommend some of the Facebook groups de

Simplifying logging with Maven and SLF4J (Part 2)

So in my  previous post  I explained how to simplify your logging with Maven and SLF4J. If you haven't read it yet, please do before reading more.  Since then I've discovered an easier and cleaner way to remove the secondary frameworks from your Maven dependency tree. Here's a revised overview of the steps: Decided which logging framework will be your primary, aka who will actually write to your log file. Define the dependency scope of all the secondary frameworks to be ' provided '. Configure your project to depend on drop-in replacements of each secondary framework from SLF4J. Define secondary frameworks as provided Use the dependencyManagement section for this. Its used when you might have a dependency transitively. Add dependency on SLF4J Add the following to your pom.xml Conclusion So now in only 3 steps you can redirect all your logging to your primary logging framework without changing a line of code!